International Law Trial Failure In 2022. There have been many International Law Trials since the first attempt to bring the perpetrators of war against peace to justice at the Nuremberg International Tribunal 1945.
The Nuremberg Charter strictly limited the court’s jurisdiction to the Axis powers in Europe because the Allies did not want to have to answer to an international court. In response to accusations of victor’s justice, the Western democratically minded judges worked to ensure procedural safeguards for the accused. Judgement according to deeds.
The International Military Tribunal was opened on 19 November 1945 in the Palace of Justice in Nuremberg
The first session was presided over by the Soviet judge, Nikitchenko. The prosecution entered indictments against 24 major war criminals and seven organizations – the leadership of the Nazi party, the Reich Cabinet, the Schutzstaffel (SS), Sicherheitsdienst (SD), the Gestapo, the Sturmabteilung (SA) and the “General Staff and High Command”, comprising several categories of senior military officers. These organizations were to be declared “criminal” if found guilty.
The Soviet Union Pact of Aggression 1939 with Adolf Hitler Nazi Germany was suppressed. The genocide of the Polish nationals by the Soviet secret police was denied by the Soviet delegation at Nuremberg. Even when the International Red Cross had investigated the evidence at the mass graves of Katyn forest. The documented evidence of Soviet leadership approving the execution of 22, 000 Polish nationals would surface after the fall of Soviet Union in 1991. They can be viewed on Wikipedia today.
Katyn Forest Massacre.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katyn_massacre
The Soviet war crimes from 1939-1945 were as guilty as Nazi Germany’s deeds in the Molotov & Ribbentrop Pact, yet the Soviet leadership suppressed it.
Western leaders let Stalin off the hook of accountability.
The Soviet-Russia leadership’s lack of moral accountability to moral law would boomerang back to the Western leaders again and again.
- During the cold war,
- Korean war,
- Vietnam,
- Cuba crises,
- Syria war,
- Crimea and
- East Ukraine
- Invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
- The Russian leadership has never come clean from the war crimes of the Soviet Union; that is precisely why the Russian leadership plans to take action like criminals,
- Completely ignoring International law.
Nuremberg Trials 1945
Between 1939 and 1945, Nazi Germany waged wars of aggression across Europe, invading Czechoslovakia, Poland, the Low Countries, France, Denmark, Norway, Yugoslavia, Greece, and the Soviet Union.
A CLAIM FOR A TRUE WORLDVIEW.
International Law.
Unlike crimes against humanity and war crimes, aggression had not been illegal in international law before World War II. In early 1942, representatives of several governments-in-exile joined together to demand an international court to try the Axis crimes committed in occupied countries. The United States and the United Kingdom refused to endorse this proposal, considering the failure of war crimes prosecutions after World War I.
During the war, Soviet criminologist Aron Trainin developed the concept of crime of aggression which was used at Nuremberg.
The Soviet Union wanted to hold a show trial similar to the Moscow trials in order to demonstrate the Nazi leaders’ guilt and build a case for war reparations necessary to rebuild the Soviet economy, which had been devastated by the war.
Nuremberg Prosecutors.
The Nuremberg prosecutors decided to make conspiracy to commit crimes against peace a separate charge from commiting crimes against peace. They also expanded this conspiracy charge to include conspiracy to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Following the definition of the crimes laid out in the Charter, however, the IMT rejected the prosecutors’ charges of conspiracy to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity.
The indictment used a new legal term: genocide. The word had been coined just one year earlier by Raphael Lemkin, a Polish-Jewish international law expert. Under the charge of war crimes, the indictment described the “murder and ill-treatment of civilians” committed by the defendants as “deliberate and systematic genocide, viz., the extermination of racial and national groups.” The IMT prosecutors repeatedly employed the term genocide during the trial, but the judges did not adopt it in their verdict.
Source: https://encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/international-military-tribunal-at-nuremberg
International Law Trials.
- The Nuremberg trials
- The Doctors’ Trial
- The Milch Trial
- The Judges’ Trial
- The Pohl Trial
- The Flick Trial
- The IG Farben Trial
- The Hostages Trial
- The RuSHA trial
- The Einsatzgruppen Trial
- The Krupp Trial
- The Ministries Trial
- The High Command Trial
- The Auschwitz Trial
- The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trials
- The Dachau Trial
- Buchenwald
- Mauthausen
- Flossenbürg
- Mühldorf
- Dora-Nordhaussen
- The Belsen Trial
- The Neuengamme Trials
- Bucharest People’s Tribunal International Military Tribunal for the Far East Khabarovsk War Crime Trials
- Austrian, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, Finnish, German, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Latvian, Lithuanian World War II portal (Axis-War-Crimes, 1945)
STALIN TRIALS IN FINLAND 1945-1946
The war-responsibility trials in Finland were trials of the Finnish wartime leaders held responsible by the allied forces viewpoint and opinion, for “definitely influencing Finland in getting into a war with the Soviet Union and the United Kingdom in 1941 or preventing peace.”
From 1941 to 1945 England, France, and the USA were complicit in the conspiracy, war crimes and genocide that the Soviet Russian leaders committed during the Molotov & Ribbentrop pact 1939-40.
Instead of taking Soviet Stalin to an International court of law, for the crimes against humanity (Genocide against Polish Nationals 1940) The Allied forces invited Stalin into their “club” and called Stalin “Good Old Joe.”
The Brits should have stayed at home eating their own home made fish and chips on their own home island, away from their usual ambitious, provocative invasions, colony expansions and warmongering the local peoples, as in the Nordic region 1918 and 1941-45.
The government leaders of Finland were responsible for defending Finland from the Bolshevik dictator Stalin and his State Atheism totalitarian military leaders, who conspired from 1939 to 1941 with Adolf Hitler Nazi regime to exploit the Baltic States and Finland.
There was nothing irresponsible about the leaders of Finland from 1917 to 1945 when they were fighting on the right side of the Spirit of the Natural Law.
It was Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin that were doing violence to the Spirit of the Natural Law, from 1939 to 1945.
The allied leaders were weak and immoral for perverting the cause of justice; they skewed reality, tried to re define truth, justice, and world history, while justifying their own political imperialism, and nationalistic ambitions.
They used Adolf Hitler and the Nazi war crimes to leverage themselves upwards into self-righteousness. And celebrated with one of the worst war criminals of World War 2, Joseph Stalin, their imperial victor’s justice. Protecting and defending the war criminal Joseph Stalin from 1941 to 1953.
During that time, Stalin and the Soviet Union were committing war crimes against innocent people. The Allied forces victor’s justice made them further proud of self, their ears were not open to truth, nor their eyes could see the truth and reality from the East European perspective.
It was not the government leaders of Finland that were irresponsible between 1917 to 1945. How ignorant and stupid can they get? Claiming to be on the right side of the spirit of the law, while they are full of imperial bigotry.
The Soviet Union leader Joseph Stalin was protected and given favoritism regardless of all the war crimes that he was guilty of. Why the obvious hypocrisy?
Were the British and Americans so gutless with the court of the law that they had their tail between their legs when Stalin was around?
What happened to the principles of the Rule of Law based on the Spirit of the Natural Law? Representing the Spirit of True Justice? In the minds of the Allies victors, it was no longer valid, they had achieved their objectives, and they were then playing the role of gods according to their own nationalistic interests.
Their worldview was black and white, the devil of their mind was slain with Hitler and the Nazi war criminals.
They did not see their own corruption, being used by the same force that had worked Stalin since early 1900 to 1939.
In the same spirit with the Hitler that destroyed millions of innocent lives in East Europe. The Allied forces did not see their own wrongs; they did not listen, or see the obvious truth, they patronized the Soviets leaders regardless of the crimes that they had committed between 1939 to 1945.
The Allied victors were also corrupted, they blended their own nationalistic politics with moral laws. In their own mind they thought they were morally upright, but, they were just playing their own political game for their own nationalistic advantage. But they only saw the world through their own short-sighted political colored lenses.
Others did not have the same rights because of their own biases, they saw themselves as being morally on high ground, beyond the “evil doers.”
Therefore, they skewed the truth in history; they misrepresented the Spirit of the Natural Law. They did not defend or speak up for the Spirit of The Natural Law with those that were fighting against the spirit of Satan in Joseph Stalin and the Soviet Union state atheism totalitarian regime.
They failed to represent True Justice.
They cowered and did not want to offend the will and the territorial ambitions of Stalin, by questioning the Russian role in the Nazi German-Soviet Pact of Aggression.
The Soviet leadership committed severe war crimes, including genocide of Polish nationals, at the Katyn Forest Massacre, murdering 22,000 POW and civilians in 1940. Also exploited the people of several Baltic States in East Europe.
There was real evidence presented of the Katyn forest massacre of the Allied forces, Roosevelt repressed it on the bases of Utilitarianism.
Others did not want to think about it. The Soviet prosecutor at the Nuremberg Trials tried to offload the 1940 Katyn forest massacre as war crimes onto the Nazi officers, but the German military forces had provided sufficient evidence by then of the truth to the Red Cross, and the Allies members (except Russia) rejected the false claims. Therefore, the False Soviet documents were rejected.
But nothing is done to defend the Spirit of the Natural law. Nothing said to defend the cause of the innocent that died due to the Soviet role in the Nazi German-Soviet Pact of Aggression 1939 – 1941.
“The chief Soviet prosecutor submitted false documentation in an attempt to indict defendants for the murder of thousands of Polish officers in the Katyn forest near Smolensk. However, the other Allied prosecutors refused to support the indictment, and German lawyers promised to mount an embarrassing defense. No one was charged or found guilty at Nuremberg for the Katyn Forest massacre. In 1990, the Soviet government acknowledged that the Katyn massacre was carried out, not by the Germans, but by the Soviet secret police.”
(Nuremberg-1945, Nuremberg trials, 1945)
FALSE ACCUSATIONS
Double standards, with false accusations made against the government leaders of Finland. Even the name used in the proposition, in the context of the 1939-1945 has fabricated a lie. A sure sign of the Nemesis, using the political influence and the military power of the Allied forces, to push false accusations onto innocent victims.
A FALSE BALANCE IS AN ABOMINATION
“A false balance is an abomination to the LORD, But a just weight is His delight.”
Proverb 11: 1
Satan’s strategic tactics have common characteristics as a deceiver of truth. The Holy Bible says this.
“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!”
Isaiah 5: 20. ( 500 BC)
A CLAIM FOR A TRUE WORLDVIEW-
Buy This Book Online Today!
Thank you for visiting Kilpis Lake Adventures and reading this INTERNATIONAL LAW TRIAL FAILURE IN 2022 article post. We hope it was helpful, useful and practical. For more similar articles please do visit http://aclaimforatrueworldview.com/index.php/blog/ website.
A CLAIM FOR A TRUE WORLDVIEW. (Biblical Worldview).